Why Apple should buy Clearwire

In the past year or so, there has been a lot of speculation on what exactly Apple ($AAPL) will do with the huge amount of cash (now over $76 billion) they have on their balance sheet. A good roundup of the more popular theories of what can happen with that cash can be found here at the GigaOM blog.

Steve Jobs has said that Apple is accumulating a lot of cash to ultimately be able to take “big, bold risks” that create substantial value for shareholders. Some of the riskier moves that are discussed in the link above – like acquiring Facebook – certainly fit the “bold” category but don’t really represent any real value to Apple’s core businesses.

A big, bold move that actually makes sense would be to use some of that cash to buy Clearwire’s ($CLWR) network assets and develop a nationwide wireless data network exclusively for their devices. 

Why does this make sense? Read on.

1. Wireless internet access is key to Apple’s product strategy (especially after iCloud launches) and it’s completely in the hands of third parties.

Steve Jobs is a control freak. Apple’s success in launching revolutionary products is due in no small part to a need inherited from its CEO to have direct control over most of the pieces that go into the “experience” of these products.

Every Apple device is part of a tightly managed ecosystem – from hardware and software to customer service and retail experience all the way to third party apps and accessories – that makes using them much more useful and entertaining than any gadget itself could ever achieve. When I buy an iPod I’m not only buying an mp3 player, I’m buying a key to the iPod experience, micromanaged by the folks at Apple.

This said, there’s an increasingly central piece of the puzzle that Apple has not been able to control yet. Most Apple devices depend on wireless internet connectivity to be able to deliver their full potential, and this will be even more so when iCloud (Apple’s new online backup platform) is finally rolled out with iOS 5 in the next couple of months. This is usually not a problem when we’re at home with our high bandwidth wifi connections, but as we venture into the cold broadband-less world we can almost feel Steve Jobs trembling at the thought that our carefully crafted Apple Experience is now in the merciless hands of the likes of AT&T, Verizon or our nearest Starbucks hotspot.

2. Not only is network quality at the mercy of third party providers, but carriers also decide the way our devices interact with their data networks.

Skype calling was exclusively available on WiFi for a very long while, and Apple took 4 years to come out with a feature as essential as iOS Messaging. It’s no coincidence that these two features directly compete with voice calling and SMS, the two main revenue sources for wireless carriers. FaceTime is also only available on WiFi because it takes up too much of the bandwidth that carriers need to offer voice, SMS and the myriad other services they provide alongside Apple’s data. As long as carriers filter the way Apple devices interact with their networks, Apple will never be able to offer their users a full internet experience wherever they are.

Furthermore, if Apple had full management of their own wireless network, they could offer innovative pricing and usage models that would benefit their developers and end users. Users wouldn’t need to pay for a monthly data plan if they don’t need the full internet experience on the go, yet they could still download songs and apps from iTunes remotely through the network. Developers could also bake bandwidth costs into their business models and offer online content and features in their apps while the users don’t feel they’re overpaying for a costly mobile internet connection. The internet would be deeply integrated into the iOS experience, like it should be, and Apple would provide a truly revolutionary online experience.

3. Clearwire was a costly mistake and its shareholders, especially Sprint, need an exit. Fast. 

Clearwire was formed in 2004 as a data-only wireless service provider by visionary cell phone pioneer Craig McCaw. He correctly predicted that cell phone companies would ultimately have to evolve into data providers and decided to build Clearwire to get there first and with the optimal network for this task. At the time, a wireless technology called WiMax seemed to be the frontrunner to become the standard for 4G wireless data delivery, so Clearwire made a hard bet on it and build their entire business around the 802.16 WiMax standard.

In the years since then however, another technology called LTE overshadowed WiMax and became the true standard for next generation wireless data networks. The only other wireless carrier who bet on WiMax, Sprint, merged their network with Clearwire’s in 2006 and became the largest shareholder of the combined company. Sprint announced this year that they will be building out an LTE network despite their involvement in Clearwire. This spells bad news for the WiMax standard as it seems their last major supporter in the US is hedging their bet and going with the competition. It also leaves Sprint in the uncomfortable position of supporting two very expensive networks built on competing standards. The cost of building out their new LTE network is estimated at around $20 billion in the next 15 years.

4. Apple is the white knight that Sprint needs, and if it moves quickly it will be getting Clearwire’s assets at a bargain basement price. 

Clearwire’s market cap is currently hovering around $2.5 billion (and dropping fast), which gives it a total enterprise value of around $12 billion when you include liabilities and minority interests. If Apple made an offer of $15 billion for the entire company (including liabilities), shareholders would receive a 40% premium on current market value. As the share price only seems to be headed downward, this would be a very hard offer to refuse.

Sprint would also be very happy with a deal like this because it would receive some much needed cash that it can put towards building out its new LTE network. Also, since Apple doesn’t need the 9.5 million subscribers that Clearwire is expected to have at the end of 2011, I’m sure they would be more than happy to let Sprint transition them over to their new network whenever it’s ready. This deal would probably reduce the price Apple would ultimately pay for Clearwire to about $10 billion, which is less than thebook value of Clearwire’s assets.

At a generous $10 billion price tag, Apple would be acquiring spectrum that has been valued at $20 billion, plus an operational high-speed wireless data network that reaches 126 million people in the US, for LESS than it would cost them to build it from scratch. Even if they spent another $5 billion TODAY to make the service available to the entire US population with the highest service quality possible, they would still be getting an absolute bargain. Plus they would still be left with around $61 billion in the bank.

5. Apple’s adoption of WiMax in the US would finally give the technology the scale it needs to become a viable alternative globally. 

If Apple buys Clearwire’s assets and adopts WiMax as its standard wide-area wireless networking technology, it would need to put WiMax chips into the approximately 150 million devices it sells every year. This kind of scale would bring chip and equipment prices down for everyone using WiMax globally and make it a more attractive option for device manufacturers to integrate into their products.

Intel ($INTC), who is one of the most prominent members of the non-profit WiMax Forum and one of the leading manufacturers of integrated WiMax chipsets, would also be very interested in a deal like this happening. Analysts have recently reported that Intel is pursuing a partnership with Apple to manufacture the chips for their iPods, iPads,  and iPhones. If all of these devices now needed an embedded WiMax chip, Intel would begin to look much more attractive as a manufacturing partner.

What do you think? Should Apple buy Clearwire’s assets and become a wireless internet provider for its own devices? 

Follow me on twitter: @pedrotp

  1. craig said:

    I heard the author, Pedro, has friends who own stock in CLWR and Sprint. I wonder if there is any truth to this rumor. Obviously the author has no CLWR or Sprint stock himself, else he’d have disclosed it.

  2. David Room said:

    Interesting article but I see two major problems:

    1) How does Apple integrate Wimax into 220m existing iOS devices?

    2) Why would a company as innovative as Apple take on a wireless network based on an outdated standard where everyone else is building out LTE? The extra funds to simply build their own network would barely dent the remaining cash balance.

    On balance, I believe this to be a non-starter.

  3. Colin Chai said:

    I agree with this brilliant idea. We in Malaysia are already enjoying iPhone 4 FaceTime using the YTL’s powerful 4G Wimax enabled Yes Network. I enjoy seamless speedy broadband throughout the whole country.
    More brilliant is to work with the other 2 Wimax players Japan’s UQ and Korea Telecoms. With Apple Sprint linking up with these 3 IT savvy economie, international broadband roaming becomes affordable. (Cost a bomb now!)
    Please Steve, support these game changer networks as your last lasting legacy.
    It is truly your enlightened self interests and the world will thank you for it!

  4. GRETA said:

    Great post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m inspired! Extremely helpful info particularly the ultimate section 🙂 I care for such info a lot. I used to be seeking this particular info for a very lengthy time. Thanks and best of luck.

  5. Audric said:

    I am a “AVID” pursuer of Apple devices. I began my journey with Apple in 2008 with the purchase of the iPhone 3G. Today, I have converted all of my family members over, so they too can have the “Apple Experience!” We now use Apple Mobile Devices, iMac & MacBook CPU’s, and Apple’s post pc tablet, “The iPad.” I say all this to establish that Apple has successfully & consistently developed the most sophisticated devices used today and now it is time to take the next step.

    Not only am I a user of Apple products, I am a Clearwire shareholder. I think If Apple made a serious offer, shareholders like myself who want Clearwire to be success would be open to closing a deal without hesitation. This move would not benefit one company, but produce millions for both companies. Be mindful, this is not a solicitation for Apple, but just my thoughts on the topic above.

    I believe that we (Clearwire) have some very smart individuals at our bargaining tables and would only choose the best offer for Clearwire whomever that may be.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: